State passes legislation satisfying some of HSH's concerns in the industry

Well great news from the State of Connecticut this morning! Legislation is being passed that will more clearly define the employer/independent contractor relationship and will help to eliminate this unethical practice of labeling employees as "sub contractors" to get out from underneath the tax and worker benefit responsibility. Its been crippling to small business who have attempted to take the traditional employee/employer route and in fact has been crippling the very companies that engage in this practice to begin with! They surely are not prepared to protect an employee in an emergency and A. become exposed and/or B. disenchant their workers into leaving for the competition or starting their own business and competing directly! For the sake of a few lowsy bucks a month. Below is the law in this matter, currently defined. This excerpt was taken from the Employment Security Division of CT.

 

 

 

STATE OF CONNECTICUT


EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION


UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION TAX DIVISION


 


SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP FOR CT UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES


 


The determination of independent contractor status versus employee status is often a complex decision.  Connecticut unemployment law states that employment is any service performed under an express or implied contract of hire that creates the relationship of employer and employee.  Workers who are employees under the common law definition of master and servant (the standard applied by the Internal Revenue Service) are therefore covered for state unemployment purposes.  In Connecticut however, irrespective of whether the common law relationship of master and servant exists, the law holds that service will be considered employment subject to the act unless the service recipient can establish compliance with Connecticut General Statutes Section 31-222(a)(1)(B)(ii), commonly referred to as the AABC@ test which is outlined below.


 


To be considered an independent contractor, an individual must meet all three of the following tests.


 


A.    The worker must be free from direction and control in the performance of the service, both under the contract of hire and in fact.  (Essentially, this is the common law definition.)

AND


B.    The worker=s services must be performed:


 


EITHER


 


(1) Outside the usual course of the employer=s business

OR


(2) Outside all of the employer=s places of business.


 


AND


 


C.    The worker must be customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business of the same nature as the service being provided.


 


 


 


Why does this qualify as blog material? Well simply because with HSH Pet Care, you are getting not only the best pet care available in CT but a co. that considers its reputation in business practices as well. We want everyone to know who and what they are getting and that doing the right thing is important to us as it is our clients. We have always maintained an employee/employer relationship and have been fighting to have these "sub contractor" loopholes in the tax & compensation legislation identified. This is a great win for the cause!


 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.